Skip to main content

Three agential forces that have destroyed the humanity!

My conversation with Gourav Roy this morning on the brutal and untimely death of Ms. Twinkle Sharma (with some additions)
Many Twinkles are abused everyday, some of them are brutally killed! These incidents happen everywhere, with everyone!
Our souls are abused everyday, and our inspirations are killed everyday too; isn't it?
But who cares!
Society is becoming increasingly intolerant. The ‘I’m the (sic) man’ attitude among many has taken a great toll on the humankind. What we’ve become as humans? 
Our day mostly starts with intolerance, continues with it through out the day, and ends with it in the night too. At the wash basin we wash our face with one hand and hold the telephone with the other scolding our reports with the choicest abuses, in the public transportation system show manliness at fellow commuters, in the cafeteria look down upon 'that shabby looking Zamato guy' adjacent to us who like us has paid and is sipping her/his cup of coffee (not ours), hurl four lettered words at others at the traffic light, wrote all sorts of nonsense at others on the FB wall, and finally in our sleep shout at our day’s failures only to wake up the next morning to continue unabashedly with our intolerant Rants and ruckuses! Where does all of these lead us towards? 
Inhumanity, I guess! 
Who's failed, here? I zero in on three agential forces that have abysmally failed to live up to the expectations of society. One, the political leaders have failed to create the common goods a reality and build a a societal consciousness toward respecting these goods (which includes solidarity, trust, tolerance, empathy, etc.)! Two, the business managers have failed to realise Adam Smith's self-interest with prudence concept thereby making us sentient toward the explicit as well as the implicit needs of the stakeholders (which also includes to bestow dignity upon the most marginalised, indirect stakeholders like the tribals)! Three and most importantly, the intellentsia and teachers have failed to impart the right value systems into the citizens in their formative years and making them first of all humans and then employees! 
And, now comes B-schools--one of the seats of modern (industrial) society!
Recently, somewhere in the eastern part of India, I interacted with an established professor from the IIT Delhi. She asked me, "On what kind of ethics, modern capitalism is based?" "I replied, "Act utilitarianism." She countered, "No, Adam Smith's concept of enlightened self-interest." "Hmm," I pondered. Citing Crane and Matten's textbook, I rebutted, "Adam Smith's school of ethical thoughts is called egoism; enlightened self-interest is a word cointed by the French political scientist Alexis de Tocqueville." Looking down upon me, she said, "No ...," and went on and on with her speech. (Guess what! She isn't a scholar of ethics not moral philosophy! An "I-also-know-ethics" kind of a professor!)
When teachers from the premier institutes, to whom the public looks for direction, spread mis- and ill-information among citizens; one can very well understand where the (hu)mankind is moving towards...
... And I heard them saying, “Quantabilities are more important than ethicompetencies!” 
With the who-cares mindset that is widespread in society, even God can’t save the (hu)mankind from total annihilation. 
Humankind is dead; long live humanity! 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In Search of the Motherly Manager: Unlocking the KADAMBINI code

In Search of the Motherly Manager: Unlocking the KADAMBINI code " All that I am, or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother. " - Abraham Lincoln (the 16th President of the United States of America) " Achieving the highest possible return on human capital must be every manager's goal ." - Brian Tracy (Canadian-American motivational public speaker and self-development author) 'M' for Mother, 'M' for Manager! Mother! She conceptualizes us during her marital bliss, being unaware of who we are or will become. She bears us in our embryonic state, compromising with many of her normal ways of living. She gives birth to us, being in unbearable pain. She grooms us, sacrificing much of her comforts. She wipes our tears away, even if she's chocking inside. She attends us when we are sick and weak, spending sleepless nights. She ties our shoelaces, enduring back pain at times. She helps us in our homework, forgetting her favorite soap ope...
2 comments
Read more

Apathy toward business ethics! Are we confused between the message and the messenger?

Apathy toward business ethics! Are we confused between the message and the messenger? “ Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do .” — Potter Stewart (Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, serving from 1958 to 1981) While teaching the MBA Oath 1  (Nohria & Khurana, 2008), I mentioned Prof. Nitin Nohria, the first Asian Dean of the Harvard Business School, as one of the pioneers of teaching business ethics and discussed what MBA Oath referred, why it should be administered, and how to create ethical conduct in leaders and managers. Many of the students were not convinced. One of the reason could be the composition of the class (nearly 85-90 percent of the students have engineering background); they mostly believe that the crux of scientific causality is (traditional) positivism 2  and many aspects of ethics are based on antipositivism 3  and/or constructionism 4  paradigms. Hence, wh...
1 comment
Read more

Apathy toward business ethics! Are we confused between the message and the messenger?

While teaching the MBA Oath (Nohria & Khurana, 2008), I mentioned Prof. Nitin Nohria, the first Asian Dean of the Harvard Business School, as one of the pioneers of teaching business ethics and discussed what MBA Oath refers to, why it should be administered, and how could create ethical conduct in leaders and managers. Many of the students were not convinced. One of the reason could be due to the composition of the class (nearly 85-90 percent of the students have engineering background); they mostly believe that the crux of scientific causality is (traditional) positivism and many aspects of ethics are based on anti-positivist and constructionism paradigms. Hence, when it comes to business ethics, most of my students are of the opinion that it does not deserve a space in the management science curricula nor in manager practitioners’ field.      In the middle of the classroom discussion, one of the students quipped, “How can he [Prof. Nohria] talk about ethics [M...
Post a Comment
Read more