Skip to main content

Three agential forces that have destroyed the humanity!

My conversation with Gourav Roy this morning on the brutal and untimely death of Ms. Twinkle Sharma (with some additions)
Many Twinkles are abused everyday, some of them are brutally killed! These incidents happen everywhere, with everyone!
Our souls are abused everyday, and our inspirations are killed everyday too; isn't it?
But who cares!
Society is becoming increasingly intolerant. The ‘I’m the (sic) man’ attitude among many has taken a great toll on the humankind. What we’ve become as humans? 
Our day mostly starts with intolerance, continues with it through out the day, and ends with it in the night too. At the wash basin we wash our face with one hand and hold the telephone with the other scolding our reports with the choicest abuses, in the public transportation system show manliness at fellow commuters, in the cafeteria look down upon 'that shabby looking Zamato guy' adjacent to us who like us has paid and is sipping her/his cup of coffee (not ours), hurl four lettered words at others at the traffic light, wrote all sorts of nonsense at others on the FB wall, and finally in our sleep shout at our day’s failures only to wake up the next morning to continue unabashedly with our intolerant Rants and ruckuses! Where does all of these lead us towards? 
Inhumanity, I guess! 
Who's failed, here? I zero in on three agential forces that have abysmally failed to live up to the expectations of society. One, the political leaders have failed to create the common goods a reality and build a a societal consciousness toward respecting these goods (which includes solidarity, trust, tolerance, empathy, etc.)! Two, the business managers have failed to realise Adam Smith's self-interest with prudence concept thereby making us sentient toward the explicit as well as the implicit needs of the stakeholders (which also includes to bestow dignity upon the most marginalised, indirect stakeholders like the tribals)! Three and most importantly, the intellentsia and teachers have failed to impart the right value systems into the citizens in their formative years and making them first of all humans and then employees! 
And, now comes B-schools--one of the seats of modern (industrial) society!
Recently, somewhere in the eastern part of India, I interacted with an established professor from the IIT Delhi. She asked me, "On what kind of ethics, modern capitalism is based?" "I replied, "Act utilitarianism." She countered, "No, Adam Smith's concept of enlightened self-interest." "Hmm," I pondered. Citing Crane and Matten's textbook, I rebutted, "Adam Smith's school of ethical thoughts is called egoism; enlightened self-interest is a word cointed by the French political scientist Alexis de Tocqueville." Looking down upon me, she said, "No ...," and went on and on with her speech. (Guess what! She isn't a scholar of ethics not moral philosophy! An "I-also-know-ethics" kind of a professor!)
When teachers from the premier institutes, to whom the public looks for direction, spread mis- and ill-information among citizens; one can very well understand where the (hu)mankind is moving towards...
... And I heard them saying, “Quantabilities are more important than ethicompetencies!” 
With the who-cares mindset that is widespread in society, even God can’t save the (hu)mankind from total annihilation. 
Humankind is dead; long live humanity! 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hypocrisy and being critical could be just millimetres apart!

Hypocrisy and being critical could be just millimetres apart! People hate subsidies. They say it takes us toward the Stone Age. But many of them, at least from my generation, have forgotten that they could complete higher studies with the meagre salary that their parents used to earn in the eighties and early nineties. Many of those cheap educational programs came from subsidies. (Though, I can understand the millennial generation hating subsidies because they hardly have enjoyed them.) Second, people hate political and corporate leaders who talk about philanthro-capitalism. However, when Michael Porter lectures about creating shared value, i.e., simultaneously creating economic and socio-environmental values, the very same people applaud in the audience. (Though I can understand the millennial generation getting confused encountering this new form of capitalism.) Third, people look at Prof. Md. Yunus and Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam with awe and appreciation for their gener...
Post a Comment
Read more

The present state of the Corporate and two fundamental issues

The present state of the Corporate and two fundamental issues Yesterday Kingfisher went off the sky, today it's the turn of Jet, and tomorrow (God forbid) another! Who's at fault? Employees? Company decision-makers? Shareholders? Governments? And the list goes on. I ain't here to find where the fault lies; there're many who're already doing it. Rather, I'm rekindling two issues that have been ignored by practitioners and academics alike, since quite some time. As management is neither a science nor an art, but a practice; I'll discuss the practitioners' issue first. So, here's the first one. It pertains to the practitioners. It hovers around the classic question posed by Socrates in the fourth century BC: How 'one' should live? The question isn't how I should live? Or, how you should live? But, how 'one' should live? The 'one' that Socrates mentioned is the human, i.e., homo sapiens. Homo sapiens isn'...
Post a Comment
Read more

Making business ethics a core course in B-schools

In many B-schools, business ethics (BE) is being introduced as a core course. One needs to analyse the demand side and supply side to find its true relevance for managers. The demand side practitioners emphasize on bottom-line. It's not that they don't prefer ethical decision-making but they just don't know whether the other person is ethical or not. Consequently, the demand side mostly tries to give lip-service to it to cut cost and remain a going concern. The supply side mainly comprises of consultants and B-school faculties who generally try to operationalise BE as CSR or a means to mitigate various (extra) costs like government regulations/interventions, hue and cry by civil society activists, etc., in the events of unethical business practices. Furthermore, who head the CSR projects in organizations; well, they are mostly the superstars with expertise in core functional areas like marketing, finance, and so on. Hence, the bottomline thinking slowl...
Post a Comment
Read more