Skip to main content

Studentoid: The new creature in the classroom


In our quest to assess the intelligence of a student, through mechanisms like exams, classroom participation, quizs, and so on; we often forget to distinguish between a student and a ‘studentoid’!


Heard of the humanoid? A humanoid is a thing in the guise of a being that has an appearance resembling a human being without really being one (Oxford English Dictionary Online, n.d.). For example, a smart phone! It can perform many intelligent functions like a human being, but it's not a human being. Rather, it has some characteristics that intrinsically are humanly.


Similarly, a ‘studentoid’ is something, not someone, who attempts to look like a student, comes to the classroom, participates in the classroom activities like hearing the lectures and taking quizzes but not necessarily being endowed with all the attributes a student.


In the view of the above, it is important to mention that a student should be interested in grades and getting a job, but a defining trait of a student is to take “an interest in a particular subject” (Oxford English Dictionary Online, n.d.).


Interest is “being engaged, engrossed, or entirely taken up with” an activity, object, or topic (Dewey, 2009[1913]: 17). It is studied as a part of: (a) “emotional experience, curiosity, and momentary motivation;” and (b) “personality, individual differences, and people’s idiosyncratic hobbies, goals, and avocations” (Silvia, 2006: 4). Hence, interest can be segregated as: emotional interest and developed interest; what someone is born with in the case of the former and what s/he grooms her/his inclinations in the case of the latter. Hence, the holistic facet of someone’s interest is the combination of the inclinations that s/he is intrinsically good at and what s/he has acquired through studying theories and experiencing (student) life in general.


Now, how many teachers in the MBA level assess a student based on the Holland Code, one of the highly reliable and valid tests to know what a person should ideally become professionally? Similarly, how many of them assess a student based on his theoretical abilities along with practical competencies? And, from a common sense angle, how many teachers note the active listening ability of a student while assessing for classroom performance? I’m afraid, not many!

Teacher or teacheroid (a discussion for another time)!

To conclude, in line with all that looks like a human isn’t necessarily human, but some could be a humanoid; all that looks like a student may not be a student but may be a ’studentoid’.


References

Dewey, J. 2009[1913]. Interest and effort in education. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Oxford English Dictionary Online (n.d.). Humanoid. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com/public/learning/loginpage

Oxford English Dictionary Online (n.d.). Student. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com/public/learning/loginpage

Silvia, P. J. 2001. Interest and interests: The psychology of constructive capriciousness. Review of General Psychology, 5: 270-290.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hypocrisy and being critical could be just millimetres apart!

Hypocrisy and being critical could be just millimetres apart! People hate subsidies. They say it takes us toward the Stone Age. But many of them, at least from my generation, have forgotten that they could complete higher studies with the meagre salary that their parents used to earn in the eighties and early nineties. Many of those cheap educational programs came from subsidies. (Though, I can understand the millennial generation hating subsidies because they hardly have enjoyed them.) Second, people hate political and corporate leaders who talk about philanthro-capitalism. However, when Michael Porter lectures about creating shared value, i.e., simultaneously creating economic and socio-environmental values, the very same people applaud in the audience. (Though I can understand the millennial generation getting confused encountering this new form of capitalism.) Third, people look at Prof. Md. Yunus and Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam with awe and appreciation for their gener...

The present state of the Corporate and two fundamental issues

The present state of the Corporate and two fundamental issues Yesterday Kingfisher went off the sky, today it's the turn of Jet, and tomorrow (God forbid) another! Who's at fault? Employees? Company decision-makers? Shareholders? Governments? And the list goes on. I ain't here to find where the fault lies; there're many who're already doing it. Rather, I'm rekindling two issues that have been ignored by practitioners and academics alike, since quite some time. As management is neither a science nor an art, but a practice; I'll discuss the practitioners' issue first. So, here's the first one. It pertains to the practitioners. It hovers around the classic question posed by Socrates in the fourth century BC: How 'one' should live? The question isn't how I should live? Or, how you should live? But, how 'one' should live? The 'one' that Socrates mentioned is the human, i.e., homo sapiens. Homo sapiens isn'...

Making business ethics a core course in B-schools

In many B-schools, business ethics (BE) is being introduced as a core course. One needs to analyse the demand side and supply side to find its true relevance for managers. The demand side practitioners emphasize on bottom-line. It's not that they don't prefer ethical decision-making but they just don't know whether the other person is ethical or not. Consequently, the demand side mostly tries to give lip-service to it to cut cost and remain a going concern. The supply side mainly comprises of consultants and B-school faculties who generally try to operationalise BE as CSR or a means to mitigate various (extra) costs like government regulations/interventions, hue and cry by civil society activists, etc., in the events of unethical business practices. Furthermore, who head the CSR projects in organizations; well, they are mostly the superstars with expertise in core functional areas like marketing, finance, and so on. Hence, the bottomline thinking slowl...