Skip to main content

In Search of the Motherly Manager: Unlocking the KADAMBINI code

In Search of the Motherly Manager: Unlocking the KADAMBINI code

"All that I am, or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother." - Abraham Lincoln (the 16th President of the United States of America)

"Achieving the highest possible return on human capital must be every manager's goal." - Brian Tracy (Canadian-American motivational public speaker and self-development author)


'M' for Mother, 'M' for Manager!

Mother! She conceptualizes us during her marital bliss, being unaware of who we are or will become. She bears us in our embryonic state, compromising with many of her normal ways of living. She gives birth to us, being in unbearable pain. She grooms us, sacrificing much of her comforts. She wipes our tears away, even if she's chocking inside. She attends us when we are sick and weak, spending sleepless nights. She ties our shoelaces, enduring back pain at times. She helps us in our homework, forgetting her favorite soap operas. She enlivens us when we're alone, forgetting her relaxation often. She protects us from evil elements, even at the cost of her wellbeing. She sends us money, cutting her expenses on many occasions. She attends our graduation day, standing under the scorching sun. She lifts us up, despite falling down in the process. She lets us get married to our fiancées, even if she knows that she will lose much of her say in our lives; and even if that means she will live her life alone and with much solitude. She is never satisfied in serving us, tries to do better and better with each passing day. Finally, one day, she passes away, naming us as the heirs of her fortunes. In death she also tries to serve us better. Why does she act in a manner to serve us?

   Action is underlined by three core elements: Affect, behavior, and cognition (ABC) (Allport, 1935). Broadly speaking, affect refers to an emotional response, behavior to behavioral intentions, and cognition to (rational) thinking. To be a mother also involves a complex web of affective, behavioral, and cognitive factors like emotional bonding with the child, a sense of accountability to meet societal norms, and enhancing her self-esteem by seeing her child becoming successful respectively (e.g., Belsky, 1984). Mother’s goal is to let her child succeed. One can notice the ABC facets in the aforesaid motherly actions. For example, the dominant facet behind sacrificing her comfort is a motherly act that is affective. Similarly intending to help us monetarily is an instance of the predominance of the behavioral aspect. And, to plan to attend our graduation day has more of cognitive elements. Mother in a nutshell is our 'carer and handler' in the material world. This functionality side of the mother has striking resemblance with manager!

    The word manager comes from the root word 'mano' or 'manus' (Latin), which in English means hand. Its equivalent Italian word is 'maneggiare,' which means to handle. The functionality of the manager encompasses five basic functions, namely planning, organizing, staffing, leading, and controlling (Koontz, 1980). Thus, manager is our handler in the professional world. Looking at the above mentioned mother's functionalities, we can see that a manager by definition is akin to the mother.

    Often I ask my students, "Who's the ideal manager whom either you've interacted with or heard about?" I mostly receive stereotypical answers, "JRD Tata," "Steve Jobs," "Indra Nooyi," "Bill Gates," "My ex-manager so and so," and so forth. Do they care to compare their mother with these managers and appreciate how superior their mother as a manager is?

    Who is a motherly manager? In searching for the motherly manager, one needs to find out the following attributes in a manager (see: Gerzema & D'Antonio, 2013).

KINDNESS: Empathetic, not merely sympathetic!
ALLIANCE-ORIENTATION: Cooperative, seeking relationships in stakeholders!
DIRECTION: Goal and deadline centric but enjoys the journey toward the destination!
ASPIRATION: Visionary with the aspiration to create stakeholder value, not merely shareholder value!
MENTAL STRENGTH: Emphasis on the mental aspects! 
BREVITY: Creating bigger impact with little resources!
INTEGRITY: Honesty and ethical living!
NONTRADITIONAL: Futuristic and innovative!
INTELLIGENCE: EQ, rather than merely IQ, that is humanity centric!

     As we can see, to be kind is mostly loaded with affective aspects; to be assiduous, directed, non-traditional, and brevity mainly behavioral; and to be cooperative, strategic, and intelligent are primarily cognitive. They are akin to seeing the forest, at the same time not missing the trees. Shouldn’t a manager strive to create successful employees like a mother shapes her child? To build individuals who are personally, professionally, and socially responsible? This needs managers to think like a woman (Gerzema & D'Antonio, 2013). A Mother to be precise! To conclude, motherly manager is a big promise not only for creating sustainable business but also human sustainability. See more at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxgTsyL4y0E  

(A blog on the first death anniversary of my mother--Kadambini)


References:

Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798-844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child Development, 55, 83-96.
Gerzema, J., & D'Antonio, M. (2013). The Athena doctrine: How women (and the men who think like them) will rule the future. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Koontz, H. (1980). The management theory jungle revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 5, 175-187.
Youtube (2012). The Athena doctrine: John Gerzema at TEDxKC. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxgTsyL4y0E

Picture source:

Google Images


Comments

  1. Atleast someone is bothered to write about unsung heroes - our mothers🙏

    ReplyDelete
  2. My friend, there are several types of mother, including those who could have many children and do not want to get fat, and there are those who should never have children, have no capacity to love and do not know how to receive love.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Studentoid: The new creature in the classroom

In our quest to assess the intelligence of a student, through mechanisms like exams, classroom participation, quizs, and so on; we often forget to distinguish between a student and a ‘studentoid’! Heard of the humanoid? A humanoid is a thing in the guise of a being that has an appearance resembling a human being without really being one (Oxford English Dictionary Online, n.d.). For example, a smart phone! It can perform many intelligent functions like a human being, but it's not a human being. Rather, it has some characteristics that intrinsically are humanly. Similarly, a ‘studentoid’ is something, not someone, who attempts to look like a student, comes to the classroom, participates in the classroom activities like hearing the lectures and taking quizzes but not necessarily being endowed with all the attributes a student. In the view of the above, it is important to mention that a student should be interested in grades and getting a job, but a defining trait

Apathy toward business ethics! Are we confused between the message and the messenger?

Apathy toward business ethics! Are we confused between the message and the messenger? “ Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do .” — Potter Stewart (Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, serving from 1958 to 1981) While teaching the MBA Oath 1  (Nohria & Khurana, 2008), I mentioned Prof. Nitin Nohria, the first Asian Dean of the Harvard Business School, as one of the pioneers of teaching business ethics and discussed what MBA Oath referred, why it should be administered, and how to create ethical conduct in leaders and managers. Many of the students were not convinced. One of the reason could be the composition of the class (nearly 85-90 percent of the students have engineering background); they mostly believe that the crux of scientific causality is (traditional) positivism 2  and many aspects of ethics are based on antipositivism 3  and/or constructionism 4  paradigms. Hence, when it comes to busi