Skip to main content

Making business ethics a core course in B-schools

In many B-schools, business ethics (BE) is being introduced as a core course. One needs to analyse the demand side and supply side to find its true relevance for managers.

The demand side practitioners emphasize on bottom-line. It's not that they don't prefer ethical decision-making but they just don't know whether the other person is ethical or not. Consequently, the demand side mostly tries to give lip-service to it to cut cost and remain a going concern. The supply side mainly comprises of consultants and B-school faculties who generally try to operationalise BE as CSR or a means to mitigate various (extra) costs like government regulations/interventions, hue and cry by civil society activists, etc., in the events of unethical business practices.

Furthermore, who head the CSR projects in organizations; well, they are mostly the superstars with expertise in core functional areas like marketing, finance, and so on. Hence, the bottomline thinking slowly but steadfastly creeps into the CSR, (sic) BE, realm; and the same vicious cycle of profiteering at all cost (and unethical modus operandi) takes the full circle. And, who are teaching BE in B-schools? We know that CSR is in great demand in the market primarily for window-dressing and cost-cutting purposes. The industy captains also are showing increasing interest in it mainly for bottom-line objectives. And, CSR is being taught in the name of BE in B-schools. Hence, it is unsurprising that one witnesses a rate race among faculties to teach it because: 1. to become the darlings of the market players and getting new consulting projects in return, and 2. to embelish their CV and get more of such projects. And most of them do not have any training nor education in ethics! All they have is a motivation to teach BE; motivation without expertise!! Isn't it like intending to drive downtown to have coffee without knowing if there's fuel in the car!!!

In the process, a subject which needs to be practiced and taught with diligence ends up being abused thoroughly. Period! As you can see the demand and supply sides of BE is just tantamount to an obsession for the sake of looking fashionable and up-to-date. Here, one mustn't forget that being ethical is fundamentally human, not entrepreneurial; BE too is. But, how many humans do we encounter in the workplace nowadays?

Till demand side is bereft of humans and supply side continues to create humanoids (the neoclassical version of managers), BE will remain an oxymoron. A situation wherein an obsolete subject will be made a core course!

Quoting Peter Drucker, “When a subject becomes totally obsolete we make it a required course.”

Doesn't Drucker's words resonate with the current state of BE as a core course in B-schools? :)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In Search of the Motherly Manager: Unlocking the KADAMBINI code

In Search of the Motherly Manager: Unlocking the KADAMBINI code " All that I am, or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother. " - Abraham Lincoln (the 16th President of the United States of America) " Achieving the highest possible return on human capital must be every manager's goal ." - Brian Tracy (Canadian-American motivational public speaker and self-development author) 'M' for Mother, 'M' for Manager! Mother! She conceptualizes us during her marital bliss, being unaware of who we are or will become. She bears us in our embryonic state, compromising with many of her normal ways of living. She gives birth to us, being in unbearable pain. She grooms us, sacrificing much of her comforts. She wipes our tears away, even if she's chocking inside. She attends us when we are sick and weak, spending sleepless nights. She ties our shoelaces, enduring back pain at times. She helps us in our homework, forgetting her favorite soap ope
2 comments
Read more

Apathy toward business ethics! Are we confused between the message and the messenger?

Apathy toward business ethics! Are we confused between the message and the messenger? “ Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do .” — Potter Stewart (Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, serving from 1958 to 1981) While teaching the MBA Oath 1  (Nohria & Khurana, 2008), I mentioned Prof. Nitin Nohria, the first Asian Dean of the Harvard Business School, as one of the pioneers of teaching business ethics and discussed what MBA Oath referred, why it should be administered, and how to create ethical conduct in leaders and managers. Many of the students were not convinced. One of the reason could be the composition of the class (nearly 85-90 percent of the students have engineering background); they mostly believe that the crux of scientific causality is (traditional) positivism 2  and many aspects of ethics are based on antipositivism 3  and/or constructionism 4  paradigms. Hence, when it comes to busi
1 comment
Read more

Apathy toward business ethics! Are we confused between the message and the messenger?

While teaching the MBA Oath (Nohria & Khurana, 2008), I mentioned Prof. Nitin Nohria, the first Asian Dean of the Harvard Business School, as one of the pioneers of teaching business ethics and discussed what MBA Oath refers to, why it should be administered, and how could create ethical conduct in leaders and managers. Many of the students were not convinced. One of the reason could be due to the composition of the class (nearly 85-90 percent of the students have engineering background); they mostly believe that the crux of scientific causality is (traditional) positivism and many aspects of ethics are based on anti-positivist and constructionism paradigms. Hence, when it comes to business ethics, most of my students are of the opinion that it does not deserve a space in the management science curricula nor in manager practitioners’ field.      In the middle of the classroom discussion, one of the students quipped, “How can he [Prof. Nohria] talk about ethics [MBA oath], when
Post a Comment
Read more